Slightly off topic but interesting reading

Bert Monroys epic painting created in illustrator and photoshop
http://www.bertmonroy.com/fineart/text/fineart_damen.htm

Kingdom


Re: Slightly off topic but interesting reading

rmd <rmd@axe.spam.iinet.net.au> wrote in
No, Bert is a unique artist and Berts quote says it all.
'To me, it is not the destination that is important - it is the
journey.'
I think from our point of view to see such incredible works serves to
light the way in the use of this incredible application, as I say to
friend who are impressed with some of my works, it's an operating system
for art more than a program. Berts work proves beyond doubt that you can
take images and alter them in any way you like and where reality didn't
exist you can create it so realistically that no photo on the planet can
ever be trusted again!
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learning is not attained by chance, it must be sought for with ardor and
attended to with diligence.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


Kingdom


Re: Slightly off topic but interesting reading

On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 23:52:33 GMT, "JJ" <long.term@virgin.net> scribbled:
Why yes, it most certainly is.


Voivod


Re: Slightly off topic but interesting reading

On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 09:38:23 GMT, Kingdom <kingdomof@REMOVEgmail.com>
wrote:
Why not just take a photo and manipulate it in photoshop. Would of
saved him lots of time.


Rmd


Re: Slightly off topic but interesting reading

why?
i would certainly employ him, but 'art' ?


Ushere


Re: Slightly off topic but interesting reading

Are you joking...
The main question is ...why?
It is an impressive demonstration of the skills of a photoshop user - but
nothing else.
It's good if you're into photoshop ..but it certainly is not art


JJ


Re: Slightly off topic but interesting reading

....
The Flemish were the first to use radiosity in their paintings - the effects
of objects illuminating one another.
It's fun to think about what people from the past would have done with
today's technology. I think most of them were innovative interesting people
who would have loved digital. For example, I think Ansel Adams would have
embraced the ability to digitally capture images, and then manipulate them
real time.
Edward Weston is a more interesting one to thing about. He used an 8x10
view camera so that he could pre-visualize the final image exactly, at its
final size. But he was a grumpy enough individual that he would probably
grouse about digital and Photoshop, just as he groused about working in the
darkroom, paper stocks, etc.
--
Mike Russell
www.curvemeister.com/forum/


Mike Russell


Re: Slightly off topic but interesting reading

Get a grip on yourself man.
Turfed it straight into the nearest bin. (Photoshop that is.)


Horace


Re: Slightly off topic but interesting reading

Aesthetics aside this is one of the more astounding "photorealistic"
original images I have seen made with Photoshop.
The amount of detail in the image that is revealed with successive
enlargements is as much a philosophical statement of a world view as it is
an aesthetic decision.
What could a guy like Van Eyck have done with Photoshop instead of oil
paint?


Bmoag


Re: Slightly off topic but interesting reading

Nice photo but it doesn't look like a painting to me. Maybe the web image is
too small to see it. Shame without that it is wasted web space.
R
...


Hebee Jeebes


Re: Slightly off topic but interesting reading

Wow. That is amazing!


Brian


Content - Slightly off topic but interesting reading
Found 10 post(s). Page 1 of 1
| 1 |










 
Household Tips- Vinegar - Stock Household Logos - Hoodia Gordonii Plus - Submit Url - Adsl Hastighet
Photoshop questions