Re: Ilford Classic A Little Too Warm I presume you are using color management properly with a hardware calibrated monitor. In my experience pearl/luster papers do not print with the over-all accuracy of glossy papers. Often prints have what might be called warm, sepia or some other similar characteristic compared to the same print on glossy paper. As you obviously realize part of the art of printing is understanding the characteristics of different paper surfaces and what that can impart to the final image. Pearl/luster papers are just not as versatile as glossy papers for all round printing. In my experience they are best for portraits/pictures of people, a subject many people use software warming filters to enhance. I am sure other people have other preferences. Sad to say but Canon color management in my experience is not all that reliable for their own papers, let alone other manufacturer's papers. With persistence you can learn to tweak the color driver settings to get reasonably predictable results if it is worth the effort to you in order to use a particular type of paper. I am not sure you want to invest in printer calibration equipment or have custom printer/paper profiles generated for you but that is another option. I have fooled around with the Monaco Optix system which uses a flatbed scanner as an intermediary. I felt it somewhat improved results from my Canon printer but if you already have a satisfactory monitor calibration device I would stick with that and play with the printer driver settings. Bmoag
|
|